Home

Previous | Next

chair, sleeping
  

I've been working on two new nonfiction books the past few weeks. I originally wrote six books on different ecosystems for Picture Window Books a few years ago. They contacted me recently to ask if I could write two more, on a very quick turnaround. I said yes and started putting books on reserve at the library.

What's been interesting to me is how different they feel. The two topics are Tundras and Coral Reefs. I started with Tundras, and that one has been kind of a grind. I found plenty of books, but they were mostly children's books from other educational publishers. I found online resources, too. But somehow, the information all has a bit of piece-it-together feel to it. There's also some disagreement among the books. Some say polar tundra includes areas near both the South and North Pole, while others say there is Arctic Tundra, near the North Pole, but no tundra at all in the southern hemisphers. And they all agree the other type of tundra is Alpine Tundra, found on high mountainsides. I'm just having a tough time getting it to all gel properly.

So, once I finally worked out my structure (these are short books and I need to condense all my basic material into 9 spreads with 3-8 brief sentences per spread), I left my notes to take a break and work on Coral Reefs.

What a difference! I guess coral reefs are a sexier ecosystem than tundras, because books and resources abound. Books for adults, lovely photo-filled coffee table books, in-depth books about life in a coral reef...And because they're a threatened ecosystem, many reputable organizations and governments have websites or at least webpages about them. And because they exist in tropical areas and are a big tourist draw (unlike, ahem, tundras), there is just more information easily available.

This week, I have to return to the Tundra and actually write my first draft, after letting my notes sit for a week while I worked on the Coral Reef research.

Anyway, it's been a good reminder to me of this aspect of writing work for hire nonfiction books. You can write two books for the exact same series, with the exact same guidelines, for the exact same payment, and one can feel almost like a vacation while the other feels a little like a forced march (across a cold, boggy plain with weak sunlight and lots of mosquitoes).

But, as usual, I'm learning lots of interesting facts and getting ideas for other writing activities based on this research. So it will all be worth it in the end...

Right?

Check out the Nonfiction Monday roundupat Anastasia Suen's Picture Book of the Day blog here!





If you're interested in learning how to get into writing for the educational market, I'll be teaching in two different formats soon.

On July 27, I'll be teaching an all-day workshop at the Loft Literary Center in Minneapolis. This in-person workshop is a look at the educational market, what it's like to write for them, and how to put together an introductory packet to start sending to publishers.

From July 22 to August 22, I'll be teaching my online workshop, Writing Children's Nonfiction Book for the Educational Market. This intense online workshop walks you through the entire process, so that at the end of the month, you are ready to start sending out packets to educational publishers. You can get all the details, see student comments, etc. here.



website metrics

Comments

( 6 comments — What do you say? )
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jun. 23rd, 2008 03:49 pm (UTC)
Same Series, Different Experiences
Elaine M.

Laura,

I sometimes feel the same way about writing poems for a collection. Some poems almost write themselves and may need little or no revision--while other poems may take days/weeks of work and rewriting. I do find that it often helps to set the troublesome pieces aside for awhile.
[info]laurasalas wrote:
Jun. 23rd, 2008 07:07 pm (UTC)
Re: Same Series, Different Experiences
Hi Elaine--So true! And so frustrating. Why isn't there a formula to follow so they all write themselves:>)

I agree about setting some aside. Unfortunately, with work-for-hire books, there's usually no time for that. But even a few days away from Tundra did help, and I was ploughing ahead with the first draft this morning.

Hope *your* writing is going well!
[info]wordsrmylife wrote:
Jun. 23rd, 2008 09:19 pm (UTC)
Maybe something about ecosystems in cold climates is plain old uninspiring? The plants are tiny, the colors muted. We aren't fond of dull and soft and barely hanging on to life, maybe? Because I live near an alpine tundra, I do find them interesting, because they are so tenacious.

The contrast you draw is a good one, though--sometimes the same work can be fun and sometimes it can be a slog.

Good luck. --I'd love to take your course, but this isn't a good time, so I'll be keeping an eye out for it in a few months.
[info]laurasalas wrote:
Jun. 24th, 2008 11:00 am (UTC)
I'm a cold-weather fan, and while I know tundras can be pretty bleak, I think they're fascinating! For me, the work at the moment is drudgery, I think, because the source material (the quantity and quality of it) is so different between the two ecosystems.

Tenacious--great word to describe the living things of the tundra!

(I'll probably offer the course again in the fall or, if not, the very beginning of 09.)

Thanks for your thoughts!
[info]beckylevine wrote:
Jun. 23rd, 2008 09:45 pm (UTC)
Laura,

Thank you so much for seeing the pieced-together feel of those books. I just reviewed some of these books, and it's so frustrating when the author can't find a pattern or a theme or some kind of continuity to give to the young readers. Kids will be lucky to get your books.

So funny, though--I know what you mean by the abundance of material on the more "lush" environments. One of the books I had was about the arctic and the other was about the rainforests--just the number of animals is so different. Now me, being a cool-climate person, actually felt too warm and claustrophobic in the rainforest books, and the arctic books (although I'm not that crazy about so much cold!) "got" me with the spare openness.

Can't you just see kids picking one or the other for the same reason? :)

[info]laurasalas wrote:
Jun. 24th, 2008 11:03 am (UTC)
I can relate! Rain forests may look beautiful, but two minutes in that lush, hot, buggy humidity and I'd be crying for some cool mountains (I grew up in Fla. and couldn't wait to leave). But writing the book on them was a snap because there was so much information (OK, not a snap, it was work, but much easier work). The books on grasslands and wetlands took more digging, for sure!

Wouldn't that be a cool study, to ask kids how they chose which ecoysystem book to read and/or write their report on. Was it the only one left? Or a place like home? Or the complete opposite of home? Or...?
( 6 comments — What do you say? )